"M1 means it's the first of many violent clashes"
Or does M1 mean May 1st? Yes, of course I am not amused by 'anti-globalization' hooliganism, but I can't agree with its media coverage as well, that depicts demonstrators as 'communists who eat children at breakfast', like in the old fascist days. Yes, among those demonstrators many are daft neomarxists who can't quite understand 'capitalism' is indeed human nature, and 'globalization' is a very good thing if the governments explore it properly. Yes, I don't like those. But what about the real demonstrators, that claim, you know, the usual stuff: better working conditions, ecological respect, less exploitation of the Third World, better healthcare, etc; in two words — peace and respect? Aren't those even a tiny bit right? I get annoyed at the media's leftism-phobia, and its tendency to mix reasonable, progressive leftism with die-hard marxist terrorism. Sometimes I wonder, aren't these 'leftish' violent instigators really right-wing agents provocateurs?···
