Trailer for The Things We Find in the Attic. I still haven’t finished editing this short film, so here’s just an appetizer.
It’s small magical realist tale, with Ana Margarida Carvalho and Inês Leite.
Trailer for The Things We Find in the Attic. I still haven’t finished editing this short film, so here’s just an appetizer.
It’s small magical realist tale, with Ana Margarida Carvalho and Inês Leite.
I have just finished reading Neil Stephenson's Anathem. It's a hard novel to digest, but it is indeed a disappointment. I would rank it even below the political potboiler Interface, Stephenson's worst in my humble opinion (I never read his earlier novels Zodiac and The Big U, but I guess it's fair to assume Snow Crash as the effective start of N. S.'s career as a singular writer). I think the word that best defines Anathem is sparse. It's quite a heavy tome, as are every of Stephenson's novels since Cryptonomicon, but while that and three-part Baroque Cycle had plots so dense the books felt as made of lead, Anathem's narrative felt like the stuff of one hundred pages at most. As a consequence, it's quite a dull read sometimes, and a narrow contest between that dullness and Stephenson's trademark brilliant observations and set pieces — far less than the usual dose here.
I'll proceed my review, now with Major Spoilers! So you better skip reading if you intend to read Anathem, although I would advise you to read something else. If Neal Stephenson's work is five star on average, why should you read the three star book?
The things that annoy me about Anathem can be summarized in simple words: Aliens. Multiple Universes. Fucking multiple endings! The novel takes place in a planet called Arbre, which is actually Earth, but existing in Universe 1.2. It's set roughly 3700 years after the Terrible Events, a kind of World War III, and a decision was made to segregate Science from the rest of the 'Saecular' society. Therefore, scholars (the 'Avout') live in seculsion in 'Maths', which are monestaries/university campuses whose gates only open for a few days every 1/10/100/1000 years, depending on the math's rank, and for those scholars the use of a number of scientific instruments — including computers — is forbidden. Scientific and technological progress has therefore slowed down to a crawl, and the Arbran landscape is very much like Earth's nowadays, sustainability achieved by genetic engineering that allows far better agriculture — Stephenson nods at agroforestry —, allows fuel and paper (!) to literally grow on trees, and dopamine to be part of the common Saecular diet.
As usual in Stephenson's novels, it might take you a couple of hundred pages to get to understand the worldview. There's a special vocabulary with delightful words like 'bullshytt', but you get the hang of that pretty quickly (and there's a glossary at the end as well as scattered about). The story then, is the account of one Fraa Erasmas, a young scholar at a Decenarian (which opens once every ten years) math, who finds himself travelling across the world in a quest to understand what is that Giant Spaceship hovering over Arbre. The problem is: by the time you get to the end of the classical first act (Giant Spaceship appears, attacks us!), you read more than half the novel. I still don't understand what was in those pages. There are long, long descriptions of the life inside the Maths, and some hints at the Saecular world as well, but no insights, nothing remarkable.
The rest feels rushed. Anathem is quite different from every other Stephenson novel — not just the whole thing with 'aliens' and spacecraft, but a very important style shift: Anathem follows just one character — Fraa Erasmas —, who is pretty much clueless about everything, in opposition with the other Stephensonian worlds, in which multiple characters and multiple agendas weave storylines that collide in spectacular fashion. Anathem lacks that colliding, so we're stuck with a bunch of uncharismatic characters — Neil Stephenson wrote far better reluctant hero characters than Erasmas in the past, and the rest feel like a medley of characters from Stephenson's other books. Thankfully, my mid-book fears that this would bog down to a messianic tale were unfounded.
But, unfortunately, not my other mid-book prediction — the 'aliens' come from Earth! Moneyafeek! Not. The whole Messal chapter, which had the potential for high spy drama, instead had that reek of Star Trek episodes: "Kirk, Spock and Lieutenant Sanchez go somewhere, who dies?" Thankfully, the whole story is more subtle than just having a spaceship full of Frenchmen, but then... a transdimensional (was that on the latest Indiana Jones?) craft that picks up people from different iterations of Earth — or kills them with surface impactors and X-ray lasers (Stephenson seemed to have borrowed the weaponary from Peter F. Hamilton)? Anyway, that turns out to be the reason behind all the neverending dialogue about multiple cosmii and the Arbran equivalent of Schröedinger's Cat. I'm not sold on that. In the final pages, the novel descends into chaos — it turns out Arbre's Universe splits whenever anything at all happens, and we get to read the mutiple possible endings to Fraa Erasmas account — ranging from the utter anihilation of everything to a Fucking Wedding!
Perhaps it isn't as terrible as I made it sound. But the thing is, writing a novel about Platonic philosophy is perhaps too ambitious, and the whole thing about treating the Platonic Ideal to the fullest extent — as a actual Universe that exists, where you may go with a spaceship but then won't be able to breathe its oxigen... it's way out there, on par with Philip K. Dick's level of fucked-upness, and I guess that's a compliment. But I guess that while reading Anathem I became a 'Procian' myself.
Three out of five.
Update: there's something else that annoyed me to no end, which I had forgot to expose — so another spoiler follows: the whole thing about 'Newmatter' and matter from 'foreign' cosmii made me think of that very nasty word in sci-fi circles: midichlorians. That everything is justified by the fact that the whole Narrative (the novel's own choice of words) skips universes discarding bad outcomes and somehow everything works so all's well in the best of the possible worlds is utterly unsatisfying. It might be indeed a lecture about the Anthropic Principle.···
Wednesday, September 24th 2008

“In Dr. Strangelove Dr. Strangelove, Kristan Horton imitates the satirical movie Dr. Strangelove and creates a new world for the film—silverware become an airplane, plastic and coffee grounds become the sky.”
How. A shame Kristian Horton’s work consists of stills only, it’d be interesting to see the entire movie this way (I was thinking of those Lego Star Wars videos). But still, this got me thinking a lot about miniature experimentation. I should have a go at silly sci-fi.
Wednesday, September 17th 2008
My good friend Joana put her 16mm short film Hypocrates online. It was done during our second year of film school (that long ago!), and I worked as 1st assistant director and editor in this film.
A quick anedocte: most of the film was shot in the backstage of Teatro Sá da Bandeira, back then a notorious screening room for porno flicks — and at times we were filming right the other side of the screen while porno sessions were under way. Good thing this film is silent, therefore…

Just finished principal photography in my newest short film*. I just want to thank the rest of the gang: Marcelino, Ines, Margarida and Joana.
You rock!
* If you are wondering: it was a sort of secret project, but will be ready soon.

The Computer History section at the Warsaw Technology Museum apparently is the place for East Bloc computer pr0n. Retrofuturists rejoice!
“She doesn’t know how much it weighs. Nobody she knows or has ever met could tell you how much their bike weighs. Likewise, she doesn’t know how far she rides each day. It isn’t interesting. She rides at a good pace, not too fast to cause a sweat, and the ride is nice enough. She likes the fresh air and she often sees friends on the bike lanes. She loves crossing The Lakes and seeing the transformation from season to season. That will suffice.”
— Copenhagen Cycle Chic. This post about bicycle technofetishism can be applied to almost everything. I’d love to see computers or digital cameras or whatever just good enough to render specs irrelevant. (via Kottke)
Wednesday, September 10th 2008
As you, the eight or nine people who visit this website may have noticed, my entire online empire was struck out of existence for a week, all because of the diligent efforts of an hacker that mass-defaced everything that was hosted at my webhosting company — thousands of sites in total (all the more depressing — the unpersonal hacking I mean — nobody really cares about my sites).
Anyway. The hosting company (which I suspect may actually be just one dude with a reseller account somewhere — this is the kind of crap portuguese laws allows) were the ones that definitely lost their face, not telling anything, not replying e-mails, just pretending it's business as usual even though they lost thousands of pages and many people's hard labour.
Just so you know: I'm switching allright! ···